<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: anil-dash</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2025-09-07T21:32:09+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Anil Dash</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2025/Sep/7/anil-dash/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2025-09-07T21:32:09+00:00</published><updated>2025-09-07T21:32:09+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2025/Sep/7/anil-dash/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://bsky.app/profile/anildash.com/post/3lybkmj7ast2c"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with the intellectual substance of virtually every common critique of AI. And it's very clear that turning those critiques into a competition about who can frame them in the most scathing way online has done &lt;em&gt;zero&lt;/em&gt; to slow down adoption, even if much of that is due to default bundling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At what point are folks going to try literally any other tactic than condescending rants? Does it matter that LLM apps are at the top of virtually every app store nearly every day because individual people are choosing to download them, and the criticism hasn't been effective in slowing that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://bsky.app/profile/anildash.com/post/3lybkmj7ast2c"&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai"&gt;generative-ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms"&gt;llms&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai-ethics"&gt;ai-ethics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="ai"/><category term="generative-ai"/><category term="llms"/><category term="ai-ethics"/></entry><entry><title>What does a board of directors do?</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/12/what-does-a-board-of-directors-do/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-12-12T22:15:43+00:00</published><updated>2024-12-12T22:15:43+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2024/Dec/12/what-does-a-board-of-directors-do/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.anildash.com//2024/06/20/dash-board/"&gt;What does a board of directors do?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Extremely useful guide to what life as a board member looks like for both for-profit and non-profit boards by Anil Dash, who has served on both.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boards can range from a loosely connected group that assembled on occasion to indifferently rubber-stamp what an executive tells them, or they can be deeply and intrusively involved in an organization in a way that undermines leadership. Generally, they’re somewhere in between, acting as a resource that amplifies the capabilities and execution of the core team, and that mostly only helps out or steps in when asked to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The section about the daily/monthly/quarterly/yearly responsibilities of board membership really helps explain the responsibilities of such a position in detail.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don't miss the follow-up &lt;a href="https://www.anildash.com/2024/06/21/dash-board/"&gt;Q&amp;amp;A post&lt;/a&gt;.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/entrepreneurship"&gt;entrepreneurship&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/governance"&gt;governance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="entrepreneurship"/><category term="governance"/></entry><entry><title>“Link In Bio” is a slow knife</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2024/May/12/link-in-bio-is-a-slow-knife/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-05-12T14:15:41+00:00</published><updated>2024-05-12T14:15:41+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2024/May/12/link-in-bio-is-a-slow-knife/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.anildash.com//2019/12/10/link-in-bio-is-how-they-tried-to-kill-the-web/"&gt;“Link In Bio” is a slow knife&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Anil Dash writing in 2019 about how Instagram’s “link in bio” thing (where users cannot post links to things in Instagram posts or comments, just a single link field in their bio) is harmful for linking on the web.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Today it’s even worse. TikTok has the same culture, and LinkedIn and Twitter both algorithmically de-boost anything with a URL in it, encouraging users to  share screenshots (often unsourced) rather than linking to content and reducing their distribution.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It’s gross.

    &lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Via &lt;a href="https://mastodon.social/@mhoye/112428510848577054"&gt;@mhoye&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/linkedin"&gt;linkedin&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/links"&gt;links&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/social-media"&gt;social-media&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/twitter"&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/tiktok"&gt;tiktok&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="linkedin"/><category term="links"/><category term="social-media"/><category term="twitter"/><category term="tiktok"/></entry><entry><title>“Wherever you get your podcasts” is a radical statement</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2024/Feb/9/wherever-you-get-your-podcasts-is-a-radical-statement/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-02-09T05:18:21+00:00</published><updated>2024-02-09T05:18:21+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2024/Feb/9/wherever-you-get-your-podcasts-is-a-radical-statement/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.anildash.com/2024/02/06/wherever-you-get-podcasts/"&gt;“Wherever you get your podcasts” is a radical statement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Anil Dash points out that podcasts are one of the few cases where the dream really did work out:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“[...] what it represents is the triumph of exactly the kind of technology that’s supposed to be impossible: open, empowering tech that’s not owned by any one company, that can’t be controlled by any one company, and that allows people to have ownership over their work and their relationship with their audience.”


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/podcasts"&gt;podcasts&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/rss"&gt;rss&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/web-standards"&gt;web-standards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="podcasts"/><category term="rss"/><category term="web-standards"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Anil Dash</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2018/May/7/anil-dash/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2018-05-07T13:28:51+00:00</published><updated>2018-05-07T13:28:51+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2018/May/7/anil-dash/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://twitter.com/anildash/status/993450843272830976"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Somebody should write up how the early-2000s push for open standards and the Web Standards Project’s advocacy are a major factor in why Apple was able to create its enormously valuable comeback. Put another way, one of the killer moments of the first iPhone demo was Jobs saying it had the “real” web, not the “baby” web, by demonstrating the NYT homepage. That would’ve been IE-only &amp;amp; Windows-only if not for effective advocacy from the web standards community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/anildash/status/993450843272830976"&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/apple"&gt;apple&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/web-standards"&gt;web-standards&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/web-standards-project"&gt;web-standards-project&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="apple"/><category term="web-standards"/><category term="web-standards-project"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Anil Dash</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Nov/18/danger/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-11-18T09:38:20+00:00</published><updated>2009-11-18T09:38:20+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Nov/18/danger/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/11/the-web-in-danger.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A AnilDash %28Anil Dash%29"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's clear that, even those who are privileged by access and wealth and the ability to amplify their own voices have anticipated that we'll all be disenfranchised by the private companies that own and control our networks of communication. And yet, most of our effort and ambition in the technology industry are not going towards building for the open web.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/11/the-web-in-danger.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A AnilDash %28Anil Dash%29"&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/openweb"&gt;openweb&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="openweb"/></entry><entry><title>The Pushbutton Web: Realtime Becomes Real</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Jul/24/pushbutton/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-07-24T18:30:01+00:00</published><updated>2009-07-24T18:30:01+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Jul/24/pushbutton/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://dashes.com/anil/2009/07/the-pushbutton-web-realtime-becomes-real.html"&gt;The Pushbutton Web: Realtime Becomes Real&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Anil Dash is excited by the potential for PubSubHubBub and Webhooks to make near-real-time scalable event publishing accessible to regular web developers. So am I.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/pubsubhubbub"&gt;pubsubhubbub&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/pushbutton"&gt;pushbutton&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/realtime"&gt;realtime&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/realtimeweb"&gt;realtimeweb&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/webhooks"&gt;webhooks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="pubsubhubbub"/><category term="pushbutton"/><category term="realtime"/><category term="realtimeweb"/><category term="webhooks"/></entry><entry><title>Exclusive: The Future of Facebook Usernames</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Jun/11/exclusive/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-06-11T09:46:15+00:00</published><updated>2009-06-11T09:46:15+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Jun/11/exclusive/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2009/06/the-future-of-facebook-usernames.html"&gt;Exclusive: The Future of Facebook Usernames&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
I have to admit I was planning to just let Facebook get on with it, assuming that the OpenID provider part would show up of its own accord—but maybe I should write a thoughtful and persuasive essay about it after all.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/facebook"&gt;facebook&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/funny"&gt;funny&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/openid"&gt;openid&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/urls"&gt;urls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="facebook"/><category term="funny"/><category term="openid"/><category term="urls"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Anil Dash</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2008/Jun/26/anil/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-06-26T17:17:30+00:00</published><updated>2008-06-26T17:17:30+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2008/Jun/26/anil/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2008/06/bill-gates-and-the-greatest-tech-hack-ever.html"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bill Gates has pulled off one of the greatest hacks in technology and business history, by turning Microsoft's success into a force for social responsibility. Imagine imposing a tax on every corporation in the developed world, collecting $100 per white-collar worker per year, and then directing one third of the proceeds to curing AIDS and malaria.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2008/06/bill-gates-and-the-greatest-tech-hack-ever.html"&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/aids"&gt;aids&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/bill-gates"&gt;bill-gates&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/hacks"&gt;hacks&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/malaria"&gt;malaria&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/microsoft"&gt;microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/philanthropy"&gt;philanthropy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="aids"/><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="bill-gates"/><category term="hacks"/><category term="malaria"/><category term="microsoft"/><category term="philanthropy"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Anil Dash</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2007/Nov/2/noljads/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-11-02T06:49:37+00:00</published><updated>2007-11-02T06:49:37+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2007/Nov/2/noljads/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://community.livejournal.com/no_lj_ads/70965.html?thread=1515829#t1515829"&gt;&lt;p&gt;But here's the thing: Regular people on the web &lt;em&gt;love&lt;/em&gt; Snap previews. I know you don't believe it - I didn't want to believe it. But it's completely true. In the testing and feedback I've seen, it's some emotional pull about the fact that links "do something" now, instead of just being on the page.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://community.livejournal.com/no_lj_ads/70965.html?thread=1515829#t1515829"&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/annoyances"&gt;annoyances&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/livejournal"&gt;livejournal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/snap"&gt;snap&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/snappreviews"&gt;snappreviews&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/usability"&gt;usability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="annoyances"/><category term="livejournal"/><category term="snap"/><category term="snappreviews"/><category term="usability"/></entry><entry><title>Cats Can Has Grammar</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2007/Apr/24/anil/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-04-24T02:02:53+00:00</published><updated>2007-04-24T02:02:53+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2007/Apr/24/anil/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2007/04/23/cats_can_has_gr"&gt;Cats Can Has Grammar&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Anil Dash gives lolcats the analysis they deserve.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/lolcats"&gt;lolcats&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="lolcats"/></entry><entry><title>Office 2007 is the Bravest Upgrade Ever</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2006/Jun/20/office/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-06-20T08:11:22+00:00</published><updated>2006-06-20T08:11:22+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2006/Jun/20/office/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2006/06/19/office_2007_is_"&gt;Office 2007 is the Bravest Upgrade Ever&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Anil Dash likes the ribbon. It’s definitely one heck of a risky move.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/></entry><entry><title>Anil Dash: Microsoft *nix</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2004/Jan/19/anil/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-01-19T23:06:01+00:00</published><updated>2004-01-19T23:06:01+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2004/Jan/19/anil/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2004/01/19/microsoft_nix"&gt;Anil Dash: Microsoft *nix&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
What if Microsoft shipped “Linux for Windows”?


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="anil-dash"/></entry><entry><title>Blogmarks</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2003/Nov/24/blogmarks/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2003-11-24T00:52:16+00:00</published><updated>2003-11-24T00:52:16+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2003/Nov/24/blogmarks/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;This entry was going to be another list of links, together with a note about how much I really needed to set up a separate link blog. Then I realised that it would make more sense just to set one up so that's exactly what I've done. I still need to implement the archive but it's &lt;span class="in-joke" title="and I am likely to be eaten by a grue"&gt;getting dark&lt;/span&gt; so I'm posting this and heading home.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My main points of inspiration were Paul Hammond's &lt;a href="http://www.paranoidfish.org/links/"&gt;bookmark store&lt;/a&gt;, Mark Pilgrim's &lt;a href="http://diveintomark.org/"&gt;b-links&lt;/a&gt;, Anil Dash's &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/links/"&gt;Daily Links&lt;/a&gt; and Jason Kottke's &lt;a href="http://www.kottke.org/remainder/"&gt;Remaindered Links&lt;/a&gt;. Since there didn't seem to be any naming convention I decided to call them blogmarks, which &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=blogmarks" title="Google Search: blogmarks"&gt;isn't a new term&lt;/a&gt; but doesn't seem to have a widely accepted meaning yet either.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The system is powered by a simple bookmarklet. To make things a little more interesting I'm capturing the referral information and using it to automatically generate the 'via' link; since the title of the previous page isn't available in Javascript I extract is using a server side script instead. I swayed briefly between using page extracts a la Hammond or sarcastic commentary a la Pilgrim and decided that commentary would be far more fun.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/blogging"&gt;blogging&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/jason-kottke"&gt;jason-kottke&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/mark-pilgrim"&gt;mark-pilgrim&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/paul-hammond"&gt;paul-hammond&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/site-upgrades"&gt;site-upgrades&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="blogging"/><category term="jason-kottke"/><category term="mark-pilgrim"/><category term="paul-hammond"/><category term="site-upgrades"/></entry><entry><title>The Google Browser</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jul/17/theGoogleBrowser/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2003-07-17T11:09:14+00:00</published><updated>2003-07-17T11:09:14+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jul/17/theGoogleBrowser/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Anil Dash &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/006726.php" title="Upon the demise of Netscape"&gt;suggests Google should start sponsoring the Mozilla project&lt;/a&gt;, and use it as a basis for releasing their own browser. He makes a very good case:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote cite="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/006726.php"&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Firebird is, finally, a usable browser, and damn close to the being the best in the world, if it isn't already. Google's shown the ability to get an installable client onto millions of desktops around the world. And they have a user experience focus that would nicely shore up the critical weakness that's dogged Mozilla from day one. If the goal is now organizing and presenting information instead of just being the best search engine, then a browser client focused on information retrieval, search, and management is a great first step. And I'd give them better than even odds at being able to grow that application into a full microcontent client if they were so inclined.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The Google toolbar is a runaway success, but could a Google browser be nearly as popular? Google seem to be in the ideal position to launch a browser: they are one of the most popular and trusted brands on the internet, and have a reputation for usability which fits brilliantly with the focus of the Firebird browsers. Mozilla advocates such as myself have long bemoaned the fact that far better browsers exist which the &lt;acronym title="Internet Explorer"&gt;IE&lt;/acronym&gt; using public are completley unaware of. Google have the marketing coverage and the influence to help them discover the alternatives.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What's in it for Google? Anil suggests built in hooks to Google's services and APIs, evolving in to a fully fledged microcontent client. I think the biggest advantage is the huge boost a well promoted alternative browser would give to the overall health of the internet. Without competition to drive it forward &lt;acronym title="Internet Explorer"&gt;IE&lt;/acronym&gt; has stagnated, and the web has stopped moving forward. Introduce "Firebird, Google edition" to the mix and things suddenly get interesting again.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh, and just think of the cool things Google could do with &lt;acronym title="XML User interface Language"&gt;XUL&lt;/acronym&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h4&gt;Further Thoughts (updated 11:27am)&lt;/h4&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With Microsoft's &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,58323,00.html" title="Microsoft Covets Google&amp;apos;s Niche"&gt;recent announcements&lt;/a&gt; that they plan to compete seriously with Google in the search market, this idea becomes even more relevant. Microsoft have a history of using the dominance in one area to win market share in another (they are after all a convicted monopoly). If they're planning a big push on Microsoft Search you can bet they'll use Internet Explorer to help them get it - it already defaults to searching MSN if you enter words straight in to the location bar. If &lt;acronym title="Internet Explorer"&gt;IE&lt;/acronym&gt; retains its market dominance, Google will be competing on Microsoft's turf, and &lt;acronym title="MicroSoft"&gt;MS&lt;/acronym&gt; don't have a very good history of playing fair. With their own cross-platform browser, Google will be in a far stronger tactical position.&lt;/p&gt;

    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="anil-dash"/></entry><entry><title>Anil Dash on diamonds</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jan/21/anilDashOnDiamonds/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2003-01-21T21:26:33+00:00</published><updated>2003-01-21T21:26:33+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2003/Jan/21/anilDashOnDiamonds/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Anil Dash: &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/004817.php"&gt;Diamonds are for never&lt;/a&gt;. A thoroughly entertaining and educating rant about the Diamond industry. Some day I hope to be this articulate.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="anil-dash"/></entry><entry><title>Syndication is not publication</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Nov/28/syndicationIsNotPublication/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-11-28T23:24:46+00:00</published><updated>2002-11-28T23:24:46+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Nov/28/syndicationIsNotPublication/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Mark Pilgrim pretty much &lt;a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/11/26.html#syndication_is_not_publication" title="Syndication is not publication"&gt;single handedly killed&lt;/a&gt; the discussion thread on syndicating weblog content with XHTML started &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/004158.php" title="syndication formats?"&gt;a few days ago&lt;/a&gt; by Anil Dash. &lt;a href="http://www.kryogenix.org/days/000378.cas" title="What&amp;apos;s the point in XHTML?"&gt;Stuart's reply&lt;/a&gt; to Mark's post is definitely worth a read though.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/mark-pilgrim"&gt;mark-pilgrim&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="mark-pilgrim"/></entry><entry><title>Syndicating blogs with XHTML</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Nov/24/syndicatingBlogsWithXHTML/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-11-24T22:01:25+00:00</published><updated>2002-11-24T22:01:25+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Nov/24/syndicatingBlogsWithXHTML/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;Anil Dash &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?archives/004158.php" title="syndication formats?"&gt;suggests&lt;/a&gt; using structured XHTML as a blog syndication format. &lt;a href="http://www.scottandrew.com/weblog/2002_11#a000469" title="Semantic Overloading"&gt;Scott Andrew&lt;/a&gt; points out that this has semantic problems in that it would mean using the class attribute to add additional meaning to a document. I was going to say that this would be an ideal opportunity to mix different namespaces in one XML document (as &lt;a href="http://www.alistapart.com/stories/inlinexml/" title="Inline XML"&gt;described&lt;/a&gt; by Lachlan Cannon) but techno-weenie &lt;a href="http://techno-weenie.com/archives/2002/11/24/000058.php#more" title="XHTML syndication"&gt;beat me to it&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/xhtml"&gt;xhtml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="anil-dash"/><category term="xhtml"/></entry><entry><title>Anil Dash does Amazon</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2002/Jun/15/amilDashDoesAmazon/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2002-06-15T21:11:15+00:00</published><updated>2002-06-15T21:11:15+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2002/Jun/15/amilDashDoesAmazon/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/index.php?blogarch/2002_06_01_archive.php#85171160"&gt;Anil Dash&lt;/a&gt; provides a &lt;a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/stuff/Amazon_valid.html"&gt;copy of Amazon's home page&lt;/a&gt; in HTML 4.0 Transitional, and it &lt;a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A//www.dashes.com/anil/stuff/Amazon_valid.html"&gt;validates&lt;/a&gt;. Solid proof that you can rewrite a complex ecommerce site in valid HTML, and another victory for the web standards movement.&lt;/p&gt;
    
        &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/anil-dash"&gt;anil-dash&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
    

</summary><category term="anil-dash"/></entry></feed>