<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: contentprotection</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/contentprotection.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2006-12-24T10:34:12+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2006/Dec/24/vista/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-12-24T10:34:12+00:00</published><updated>2006-12-24T10:34:12+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2006/Dec/24/vista/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt"&gt;A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Vista’s content protection is a nightmare for hardware manufacturers and consumers alike. It’s far worse than even BoingBoing readers would expect.

    &lt;p&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Via &lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/57243"&gt;MetaFilter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/contentprotection"&gt;contentprotection&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/drm"&gt;drm&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/security"&gt;security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/vista"&gt;vista&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="contentprotection"/><category term="drm"/><category term="security"/><category term="vista"/></entry></feed>