<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: draconian</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/draconian.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2008-08-05T22:52:05+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Mark Pilgrim</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2008/Aug/5/weapon/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-08-05T22:52:05+00:00</published><updated>2008-08-05T22:52:05+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2008/Aug/5/weapon/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2008/08/05/placating"&gt;&lt;p&gt;My Universal Feed Parser was conceived as a weapon against what I considered the gravest error of XML: draconian error handling. Recently, someone asked me to implement a switch that makes it not fall back on lax parsing in the case of an XML wellformedness error. I said no, not because it would be difficult to implement, but because that defeats its entire reason for being.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2008/08/05/placating"&gt;Mark Pilgrim&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/draconian"&gt;draconian&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/feeds"&gt;feeds&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/mark-pilgrim"&gt;mark-pilgrim&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/python"&gt;python&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/universalfeedparser"&gt;universalfeedparser&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/wellformedness"&gt;wellformedness&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/xml"&gt;xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="draconian"/><category term="feeds"/><category term="mark-pilgrim"/><category term="python"/><category term="universalfeedparser"/><category term="wellformedness"/><category term="xml"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Henri Sivonen</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2008/Mar/20/reality/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2008-03-20T14:43:43+00:00</published><updated>2008-03-20T14:43:43+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2008/Mar/20/reality/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://hsivonen.iki.fi/rdf/"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Draconian failure on error is not the answer problems of Postel's law. Draconian error handling  creates an unstable equilibrium in Game Theory terms  - it only lasts until one player breaks the rule. One non-Draconian XML5 implementation in key client product and the Draconian XML ranks would break. Well-specified error recovery is the right way to implement the liberal part of Postel's law.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://hsivonen.iki.fi/rdf/"&gt;Henri Sivonen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/draconian"&gt;draconian&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/henri-sivonen"&gt;henri-sivonen&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/html5"&gt;html5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/law"&gt;law&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/postelslaw"&gt;postelslaw&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/xml"&gt;xml&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="draconian"/><category term="henri-sivonen"/><category term="html5"/><category term="law"/><category term="postelslaw"/><category term="xml"/></entry></feed>