<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: ipc</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/ipc.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2007-05-08T21:21:30+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Guido van Rossum</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2007/May/8/guido/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-05-08T21:21:30+00:00</published><updated>2007-05-08T21:21:30+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2007/May/8/guido/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-May/007414.html"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just because Java was once aimed at a set-top box OS that didn't support multiple address spaces, and just because process creation in Windows used to be slow as a dog, doesn't mean that multiple processes (with judicious use of IPC) aren't a much better approach to writing apps for multi-CPU boxes than threads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-May/007414.html"&gt;Guido van Rossum&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/guido-van-rossum"&gt;guido-van-rossum&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ipc"&gt;ipc&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/java"&gt;java&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/python"&gt;python&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/threads"&gt;threads&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/windows"&gt;windows&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="guido-van-rossum"/><category term="ipc"/><category term="java"/><category term="python"/><category term="threads"/><category term="windows"/></entry></feed>