<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: joe-heck</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/joe-heck.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2007-05-30T01:48:44+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Joe Heck</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2007/May/30/specs/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-05-30T01:48:44+00:00</published><updated>2007-05-30T01:48:44+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2007/May/30/specs/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/05/28/REST#c1180478571.123624"&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you write a spec, write a validator alongside. How much pain could have been spared with early versions of RSS if we'd had a common, agreed upon validator. In short, it's the test suite that ultimately decides the spec.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/05/28/REST#c1180478571.123624"&gt;Joe Heck&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/joe-heck"&gt;joe-heck&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/rss"&gt;rss&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/specifications"&gt;specifications&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/tim-bray"&gt;tim-bray&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/validator"&gt;validator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="joe-heck"/><category term="rss"/><category term="specifications"/><category term="tim-bray"/><category term="validator"/></entry></feed>