<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: leohickman</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/leohickman.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2009-01-12T15:31:16+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Leo Hickman on the carbon cost of Googling</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Jan/12/leo/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-01-12T15:31:16+00:00</published><updated>2009-01-12T15:31:16+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Jan/12/leo/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/ethicallivingblog/2009/jan/12/carbon-emissions-google"&gt;Leo Hickman on the carbon cost of Googling&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Alex Wissner-Gross (who published the 7g/search figures) appears to be including Google’s extra capacity, so total CO2 output divided by number of searches. Google’s 0.2g/search estimate includes just the energy used by the servers processing your query.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/alex-wissner-gross"&gt;alex-wissner-gross&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/co2"&gt;co2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/google"&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/leohickman"&gt;leohickman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="alex-wissner-gross"/><category term="co2"/><category term="google"/><category term="leohickman"/></entry></feed>