<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: nih</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/nih.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2009-04-06T11:06:50+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Twitter: blaming Ruby for their mistakes?</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2009/Apr/6/notnih/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2009-04-06T11:06:50+00:00</published><updated>2009-04-06T11:06:50+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2009/Apr/6/notnih/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://unlimitednovelty.com/2009/04/twitter-blaming-ruby-for-their-mistakes.html"&gt;Twitter: blaming Ruby for their mistakes?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
The comments on the entry include replies from Twitter employees and the RabbitMQ consultant they brought in, and provide a full rebuttal to the various accusations of NIH that were thrown around recently.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/nih"&gt;nih&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/rabbitmq"&gt;rabbitmq&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ruby"&gt;ruby&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/twitter"&gt;twitter&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="nih"/><category term="rabbitmq"/><category term="ruby"/><category term="twitter"/></entry></feed>