<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: office</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/office.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2007-09-03T16:49:12+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>How much is that standard in the window, the one with the lovely tale?</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2007/Sep/3/bits/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-09-03T16:49:12+00:00</published><updated>2007-09-03T16:49:12+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2007/Sep/3/bits/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://swardley.blogspot.com/2007/09/how-much-is-that-standard-in-window-one.html"&gt;How much is that standard in the window, the one with the lovely tale?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
“The real loser in this could be ISO’s reputation itself.” Simon Wardley summarises the embarrassing shenanigans surrounding ISO’s rubber stamping of Microsoft’s OOXML.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/iso"&gt;iso&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/microsoft"&gt;microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/office"&gt;office&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ooxml"&gt;ooxml&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/simon-wardley"&gt;simon-wardley&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/standards"&gt;standards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="iso"/><category term="microsoft"/><category term="office"/><category term="ooxml"/><category term="simon-wardley"/><category term="standards"/></entry></feed>