<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: randomnumbers</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/randomnumbers.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2007-11-16T10:25:42+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Bruce Schneier</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2007/Nov/16/schneier/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-11-16T10:25:42+00:00</published><updated>2007-11-16T10:25:42+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2007/Nov/16/schneier/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html"&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't understand why the NSA was so insistent about including Dual_EC_DRBG in the standard. It makes no sense as a trap door: It's public, and rather obvious. It makes no sense from an engineering perspective: It's too slow for anyone to willingly use it. And it makes no sense from a backwards-compatibility perspective: Swapping one random-number generator for another is easy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/11/the_strange_sto.html"&gt;Bruce Schneier&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/bruce-schneier"&gt;bruce-schneier&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/cryptography"&gt;cryptography&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/dualecdrbg"&gt;dualecdrbg&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/nsa"&gt;nsa&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/randomnumbers"&gt;randomnumbers&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/security"&gt;security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="bruce-schneier"/><category term="cryptography"/><category term="dualecdrbg"/><category term="nsa"/><category term="randomnumbers"/><category term="security"/></entry></feed>