<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-us" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Simon Willison's Weblog: ted-chiang</title><link href="http://simonwillison.net/" rel="alternate"/><link href="http://simonwillison.net/tags/ted-chiang.atom" rel="self"/><id>http://simonwillison.net/</id><updated>2024-08-31T22:09:15+00:00</updated><author><name>Simon Willison</name></author><entry><title>Quoting Ted Chiang</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2024/Aug/31/ted-chiang/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2024-08-31T22:09:15+00:00</published><updated>2024-08-31T22:09:15+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2024/Aug/31/ted-chiang/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Art is notoriously hard to define, and so are the differences between good art and bad art. But let me offer a generalization: art is something that results from making a lot of choices. […] to oversimplify, we can imagine that a ten-thousand-word short story requires something on the order of ten thousand choices. When you give a generative-A.I. program a prompt, you are making very few choices; if you supply a hundred-word prompt, you have made on the order of a hundred choices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an A.I. generates a ten-thousand-word story based on your prompt, it has to fill in for all of the choices that you are not making.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-weekend-essay/why-ai-isnt-going-to-make-art"&gt;Ted Chiang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/art"&gt;art&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/new-yorker"&gt;new-yorker&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai"&gt;generative-ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ted-chiang"&gt;ted-chiang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="art"/><category term="new-yorker"/><category term="ai"/><category term="generative-ai"/><category term="ted-chiang"/></entry><entry><title>Quoting Ted Chiang</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2023/Jun/4/ted-chiang/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2023-06-04T14:59:50+00:00</published><updated>2023-06-04T14:59:50+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2023/Jun/4/ted-chiang/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    &lt;blockquote cite="https://www.ft.com/content/c1f6d948-3dde-405f-924c-09cc0dcf8c84"&gt;&lt;p&gt;There was an exchange on Twitter a while back where someone said, ‘What is artificial intelligence?’ And someone else said, ‘A poor choice of words in 1954’. And, you know, they’re right. I think that if we had chosen a different phrase for it, back in the ’50s, we might have avoided a lot of the confusion that we’re having now.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p class="cite"&gt;&amp;mdash; &lt;a href="https://www.ft.com/content/c1f6d948-3dde-405f-924c-09cc0dcf8c84"&gt;Ted Chiang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ted-chiang"&gt;ted-chiang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="ai"/><category term="ted-chiang"/></entry><entry><title>How to Wrap Our Heads Around These New Shockingly Fluent Chatbots</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2023/Mar/3/kqed-forum/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2023-03-03T04:59:38+00:00</published><updated>2023-03-03T04:59:38+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2023/Mar/3/kqed-forum/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.kqed.org/forum/2010101892368/how-to-wrap-our-heads-around-these-new-shockingly-fluent-chatbots"&gt;How to Wrap Our Heads Around These New Shockingly Fluent Chatbots&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
I was a guest on KQED Forum this morning, a live radio documentary and call-in show hosted by Alexis Madrigal. Ted Chiang and Claire Leibowicz were the other guests: we talked about ChatGPT and and the new generation of AI-powered tools.


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/radio"&gt;radio&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/my-talks"&gt;my-talks&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/gpt-3"&gt;gpt-3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai"&gt;generative-ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/chatgpt"&gt;chatgpt&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms"&gt;llms&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ted-chiang"&gt;ted-chiang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="radio"/><category term="my-talks"/><category term="ai"/><category term="gpt-3"/><category term="generative-ai"/><category term="chatgpt"/><category term="llms"/><category term="ted-chiang"/></entry><entry><title>ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web</title><link href="https://simonwillison.net/2023/Feb/9/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web/#atom-tag" rel="alternate"/><published>2023-02-09T21:28:37+00:00</published><updated>2023-02-09T21:28:37+00:00</updated><id>https://simonwillison.net/2023/Feb/9/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web/#atom-tag</id><summary type="html">
    
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web"&gt;ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
Science fiction author Ted Chiang offers a brilliant analogy for ChatGPT in this New Yorker article: it's a highly lossy compression algorithm for a vast amount of information which works like a JPEG, and uses grammatically correct interpolation to fill back in the missing gaps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ChatGPT is so good at this form of interpolation that people find it entertaining: they’ve discovered a “blur” tool for paragraphs instead of photos, and are having a blast playing with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


    &lt;p&gt;Tags: &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/new-yorker"&gt;new-yorker&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ai"&gt;ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/gpt-3"&gt;gpt-3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/generative-ai"&gt;generative-ai&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/chatgpt"&gt;chatgpt&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/llms"&gt;llms&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/tags/ted-chiang"&gt;ted-chiang&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;



</summary><category term="new-yorker"/><category term="ai"/><category term="gpt-3"/><category term="generative-ai"/><category term="chatgpt"/><category term="llms"/><category term="ted-chiang"/></entry></feed>